Chapter 6 –
Requesting That Which Would Enrich Life
Notes from Chapter 6:
Nonviolent Communication: a
Language of Life by Marshall Rosenberg
The fourth component of NVC addresses the question of what
we would like to request of others
in order to enrich life for us. We ask
for actions that might fulfill our needs.
1. Make requests that use
positive action language – we express what we are requesting.
Avoid making a request of what we don’t want (for example: “Don’t do that.”) There are two problems that
can happen if a request is worded in the negative:
1) people are often confused or unclear as to what is actually being
requested, and 2) negative requests are likely to provoke resistance.
Example:
A. “Please don’t
spend so much time at work.” (a request worded in the negative)
B. “Would you be
willing to spend at least one evening a week at home with the children and me.”
(a request worded with positive action language)
2. Make requests that
are clear and with concrete action language that reveals what we really
want. Word our requests
in the form of concrete actions that others can undertake.
Avoid vague, abstract, or ambiguous phrasing: 1) Sometimes the use of vague and abstract
language can mask the desire to maintain control and get needs met at the
expense of the other person’s need; 2) vague requests are
likely to provoke a defensive response.
Example: an employer inviting feedback
from employees:
A. ”I want you to
feel free to express yourself around me.” (a vague request)
B. “I’d like you to
tell me what I might do to make it easier for you to feel free to express
yourselves around me.” (a clear, positive, concrete action request)
--Requests that use vague language contribute to internal
confusion and indicate that we are not clear about what we actually want. Sometimes a person believes that they have a need for love
that manifests in a wish for the other to guess for them what their need or value
might be before they are even aware of those needs themselves. This lack of awareness of what we want from
others can contribute to frustration and depression.
3. Make requests
consciously – engage in a dialog with someone (don’t talk at them).
Example:
A. “I’m annoyed you forgot the butter and onions I asked you
to pick up for dinner.” (a vague request - a wife assumes that the husband will
understand that she wants him to go back to the store, however the husband
assumes that her words were intended solely to make him feel guilty).
B. “I see that you didn’t buy any butter or onions. Would you be willing to go back to the store to
buy them and bring them back home at the latest by 5:30 pm?” (a clear,
positive, concrete request)
-- The clearer we are on what we want back from the other
person, the more likely it is that our needs will be met.
-- Whenever we say something to another person we are
requesting something in return:1) requesting an empathetic connection – a verbal or nonverbal acknowledgment that our words have been understood; 2) requesting honest feedback – we wish to know the listener’s honest reaction to our words; 3) requesting an action the would fulfill our needs.
4. Asking for a
Reflection – to make sure that the message we sent is the message that’s
received, ask the listener to reflect it back.
The message we send is not always the message that’s
received. We generally rely on verbal
cues to determine whether our message has been understood to our
satisfaction. If, however, we’re
uncertain that it has been received as intended, we need to be able to clearly
request a response that tells us how the message was heard so as to be able to
correct any misunderstanding. On some
occasions, a simple question like, “Is that clear?” will suffice. At other times, we need more than “Yes, I
understood you,” to feel confident that we’ve been truly understood. At such times, we might ask others to reflect
back in their own words what they heard us say.
We then have the opportunity to restate parts of our message to address
any discrepancy or omission we might have noticed in their reflection.
Example: a teacher
approaches a student
Teacher asks: “Peter, I got concerned when I checked my
record book yesterday. I want to make
sure you’re aware of the homework I missing from you. Will you drop by my office after school?”
Student replies: “Okay, I know.”
Teacher asks for a reflection: “Could you tell me what you
just heard me say?”
Student replies: “You said I gotta miss soccer to stay after
school because you didn’t like my homework.”
5. Express appreciation
when your listener tries to meet your request for a reflection – An
assertion like “You didn’t hear me,” or That’s not what I said.” Or “Your
misunderstanding me,” may easily lead someone to think or feel like they are
being chastised.
Example: the teacher
perceives Peter as having sincerely responded to her request for a reflection.
Teacher : “Thank you for telling me what you heard. I can see that I didn’t make myself as clear
as I’d have liked, so let me try again.”
6. Empathize with the
listener who doesn’t want to reflect back - When we first begin asking
others to reflect back what they hear us say, it may feel awkward and strange
because such requests are rarely made.
When I emphasize the importance of our ability to ask for reflections,
people often express reservations. They
are worried about reactions like, “What do you think I am –deaf?” or “Quit
playing your psychological games.” To
prevent such responses, we can explain to people ahead of time why we may
sometimes ask them to reflect back our words.
We make clear that we’re not testing their listening skills, but
checking out whether we’ve expressed ourselves clearly. However, should the listener retort, “I heard
what you said; I’m not stupid!”, we have the option to focus on their feelings
and needs and ask – either aloud or silently, “Are you saying you’re feeling
annoyed because you want respect for your ability to understand things?”
7. Requesting feedback (to understand what is alive for the other person in response to our request) – after we express ourselves vulnerably, we often want to know:
a) what the listener is feeling – the feelings that are
stimulated by what we said, and possible needs/values causing those feelings.
b) what the listener is thinking – our listener’s thoughts
in response to what they just heard us say.
c) whether the listener would be willing to take a
particular action.
8. When speaking (and making a request) in a
group - it is important to be clear about what we are wanting back from everyone because
if we are unclear about the response we’d like (what kind of understanding or
what kind of honest response we want back from them), then we initiate
unproductive conversations and discussions that will end up not satisfying anyone’s needs (and which will waste the precious group time).
Requests vs. Demands
Requests unaccompanied by the speaker’s feelings and needs
may sound like a demand.
A request may be received as a demand when the other person
believes they will be blamed or punished if they do not comply.
When the other person hears a demand from us, they see two
options: 1) submit; 2) rebel. Either
way, the person requesting is perceived as coercive, and the listener’s
capacity to respond compassionately to the request is diminished.
The more we have in the past blamed, punished, or “laid
guilt trips” on others when they haven’t responded to our requests, the higher
the likelihood that our requests will now be heard as demands. We also pay for the use of such tactics by
others. To the degree that people in our
lives have been blamed, punished, or urged to feel guilty for not doing what
others have requested, the more likely they are to carry this baggage to every
subsequent relationship and hear a demand in any request.
How to tell if it is
a request or a demand? Observe what the speaker does if the request is not
complied with:
1) It’s a demand if the speaker then criticizes or judges
the other person after they hear that the answer is “no”.
2) It’s a demand if the speaker then “lays a guilt trip” on
the other person after they hear that the answer is “no”.
We can help others trust that we are requesting, not
demanding, by indicating that we would only want the person to comply if he or
she can do so willingly.
A. “I would like you to set the table.” (a demand)
B. “Would you be willing to set the table?” (a request) or “Would
you like to set the table?”
It’s a request when the speaker can empathize with the other
person’s feelings and needs after they say “no”. We demonstrate that we are making a request
rather than a demand by how we respond when others don’t comply. Choosing to request rather than demand does
not mean we give up when someone says “no” to our request. It does mean that we don’t engage in
persuasion until we have empathized with what’s preventing the other person
from saying “yes”.
Our primary purpose
is a commitment to the quality of the relationship – Expressing genuine
requests also requires and awareness of our objective. If our objective is only to change people and
their behavior or to get our way, then NVC is not an appropriate tool. The process is designed for those of us who
would like others to change and respond, but only if they choose to do so
willingly and compassionately. The
objective of NVC is to establish a relationship based on honesty and
empathy. When others trust that our primary
commitment is to the quality of the relationship, and that we expect this
process to fulfill everyone’s needs, then they can trust that our requests are
true requests and not camouflaged demands.
When making a request, it is also helpful to scan our minds
for thoughts of the following sort that automatically transform requests into
demands:
- He should be
cleaning up after himself.
- She’s supposed to
do what I ask.- I deserve to get a raise.
- I’m justified in having them stay later.
- I have a right to more time off.
No comments:
Post a Comment